Atlas Protocol Docs
  • Introduction
    • What is Atlas Protocol?
    • Understanding the Bitcoin Landscape
    • The Problem
    • The Solution
  • Atlas Protocol Basics
    • Multi-chain Bitcoin Liquid Staking
    • Security
    • Decentralization
    • Custody
    • How Atlas Works
    • atBTC (Atlas Bitcoin)
    • Yield Generation
    • Chain Abstraction on NEAR
  • 'The First Pillar' Testnet
    • Quest 1 - Walkthrough Guide
    • Quest 2 - Walkthrough Guide
    • Quest 3 - Walkthrough Guide
    • Quest 4 - Walkthrough Guide
    • Quest 5 - Walkthrough Guide
  • Advanced Process Flows
    • Deposit BTC Process Flow
    • Redeem atBTC Process Flow
  • Roadmap
  • Links
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Introduction

The Problem

PreviousUnderstanding the Bitcoin LandscapeNextThe Solution

Last updated 7 months ago

As illustrated in the image above, there is a Bitcoin dilemma that has yet to be solved.

  • Native BTC Staking is secure and decentralized but lacks utility and liquidity. Users benefit from security but miss out on opportunities to use their BTC in DeFi across multiple blockchains.

  • Wrapped Solutions provide more utility and liquidity, enabling BTC holders to participate in DeFi ecosystems. However, they introduce drawbacks such as centralization and reduced security.

This creates a dilemma for BTC holders:

Option 1 - Choose native BTC staking, which offers security and decentralization but lacks liquidity and utility.

Option 2 - Opt for wrapped solutions that provide greater utility at the cost of security and decentralization.

Currently, no solution effectively combines the best of both worlds, leaving BTC holders without a satisfactory option for staking their assets while maintaining both security and utility.